Which of the following is NOT a method for documenting declination of coverage?

The focus of the correct answer lies in the methods used to formally document the declination of insurance coverage. Documenting declinations serves a crucial role in the surplus lines market, as it helps ensure compliance with state regulations and provides a clear record of attempts to secure coverage from admitted insurers.

A detailed list of risks accepted in the past does not pertain to documenting declinations. Instead, it reflects on risks that have been covered, which does not contribute to confirming that a request for coverage was declined. Documentation of declinations typically involves evidence that a specific insurer has refused to provide coverage for the risks associated with the application in question.

In contrast, the other methods mentioned involve establishing a clear record of declinations. A written declination from an admitted insurer serves as an official record of their refusal. A written record of an oral declination would similarly provide documentation of a refusal that may not have been formally submitted in writing. Lastly, a record indicating non-response within a specific timeframe highlights a lack of engagement from the insurer, which can also be a valid method of demonstrating that coverage was not obtained from admitted carriers.

Thus, while other methods directly relate to documenting declinations, the option that does not align with this purpose is the list of accepted